Thursday and Friday of this past week, the band students in
my classes (and there tend to be quite a few of them) were on a trip to
Indianapolis, which for two of my classes took the number of students down to
15 or less. So, rather than sitting at
separate tables, those classes sat as one group and discussed the exercises. Since it was only one group, I didn’t need to
circulate and sat at the “table” with them the entire bell both days. The atmosphere was, as you might expect, completely
different in those two classes. The most
striking thing to me was the way that most of the kids presented the material
to me instead of the group. There was an
almost constant look of, “I’m doing this correctly…right?” in their eyes as
they kept turning toward me about every five seconds as they presented their
solutions. It took a lot of reminders to
get them to refocus on presenting to each other, interacting with each other,
questioning each other, etc. Friday was
definitely better than Thursday, but even then there still wasn’t the level of
interaction that normally pervades the classroom. These two classes are my morning classes, so
it made for quite a contrast to the afternoon, where things were running
normally, with three or four tables going at once and me checking in visually
and verbally with each group rather than sitting with them the entire
bell.
From this, it occurred to me that there may actually be an
advantage to having enough students in the classroom to force the move to more
than one group. Specifically, the
students are forced to become more self-reliant. If I’m constantly at the table with them, it
becomes really easy to fall back into the old habit of relying on the teacher
for everything from moral support to verification of the correctness of answers. (I avoided asking questions and/or agreeing
with their answers until the end of each presentation, allowing plenty of time
for the other students to catch any mistakes and ask any questions, but the
request from their glances was there almost constantly.) If, however, there is an understanding that I
need to keep track of other tables and that I can’t be with any group the
entire time, then the responsibility of running the conversation, catching the
mistakes, asking the questions, and thoroughly investigating an exercise falls
to the students by default. And normally
the kids rise to this responsibility, especially by this point in the
year. Despite the fact that we just
began the new trimester on Tuesday and that these kids have not been together
in my classroom before (they’ve had the first half of the course so they know
how things are supposed to run, but it’s a new distribution of the students
each trimester), the afternoon classes are already running smoothly, and I’m
sure the morning classes will be next Monday with the return of the band
kids. However, the fact that the
instinct to look to me rather than to each other is still there is something
that I found disconcerting to say the least.
So, one more thing to add to the to-do list: make sure the
kids understand that they can and should rely on themselves and on one another,
not only in my class but in others as well.
I’m there to double-check and refine their results, but I’m not the
driving force behind the conversations. I
thought I was already doing this, but clearly I need to do a better job. Hmmm…
But what if this is a civics class and the topics under discussion are complex and rife with areas for misunderstanding and disagreement. Also, don't you think that with enough practice and gentle reminders you could get students to work independently without your assistance, like they do, I suppose, at Exeter?
ReplyDelete